> Crossfire wrote: > > And its for this reason why you should pick well designed languages for > > education, rather than real-world langauges. It's a tradeoff. Well-designed languages for education rarely have the support necessary for doing useful work for programming in anger (including books, libraries, newsgroups, project, IDEs, example code etc.) whereas real-world languages are rarely so neat that they lend themselves to easy pedagogy. The compromise is to pick a real-world language which nonetheless is elegant and well-designed and well-thought-out, lending themselves to newcomers. Languages like Python, SmallTalk and Eiffel are members of this category. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Martin
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Matthew Dalton
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Peter
- RE: [SLUG] Learning to program David Zverina
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Crossfire
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Peter
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Crossfire
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Harry Ohlsen
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Peter Faulks
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Heracles
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Jason
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Martin
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Crossfire
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program James Wilkinson
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Harry Ohlsen
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Harry Ohlsen
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Umar Goldeli
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program Raoul Golan
- Re: [SLUG] Learning to program John Clarke