Exim is cool as. www,exim.org.
crossfires persistance in bagging qmail is amusing though.
However the joy of opensource is choice. (be it license,
theory of implementation, debianization etc)
I think its silly to bitch about qmail's non-gpl license.
(personally im more a fan of BSD's freedom, as opposed to
GPL's maintained freedom)
Make a choice, play around, and before you get too annoyed with
unix MTA's, try MS exchange ;)
Dean
Crossfire wrote:
> Rev Simon Rumble was once rumoured to have said:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:26:22AM +1100, Jeff Waugh uttered:
>>
>>
>>> I'm looking for other avenues before using qmail-pop3d, as I'm not fond of
>>> the license, and for various reasons I'd prefer something supported by my
>>> distribution.
>>
>> What you mean there's a way of doing things that isn't the Bernstein
>> Way? Wash your mouth out with soap son! 8)
>
>
> Please do NOT get me started on djb's MTA stupidity again. I've
> already publically voiced my objections to qmail on this list.
>
> Sendmail might no be the answer for most people, but qmail is hardly
> the answer for anybody when we have exim, postfix and zmailer out
> there too, all of which [to the best of my knowledge] behave far
> better than qmail.
>
> C.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
