Oh yeah, and sendmail is in a chrooted gaol for extra security.
M
At Friday, 31-01-03 21:17 (+1100), Matt Hyne wrote:
To add my 2c worth.
I have actually done this painlessly with sendmail.
It is installed in the DMZ and filters mail for spam and viruses using the
various blackhole lists and the amavis virus scanner. It then forwards
the emails onto in internal host for delivery.
It's been running nicely for months without a single problem.
Matt
At Friday, 31-01-03 15:25 (+1100), Kevin Saenz wrote:
Both programmers know what they are talking about, also have
very large egos, but postfix is less confusing in configuring.
> G'day...
>
> Basically, my biggest two factors for choice are:
> * How easy is it to set up in a DMZ and relay onto a host in the
> internal network?
> * How secure is it.
>
> Wow, qmail and postfix really seem to flame each other in regards to
> security. Some mutual chips on shoulders it would seem. :)
>
> Of course, spam filtering (using a variety of methods, including the
> statistical analysis talked of end of last year) and integration with
> anti-virus software is also important.
>
> I've ruled out qmail due to its non-Open licensing.
>
> So I guess the main two contenders left would be postfix and exim... I'm
> leaning towards exim, but its only hunch based atm...
>
> Thanks for all help given so far, and for any further discussion. (You've
> all been great so far!)
>
> Mike
> ---
> Michael S. E. Kraus
> Administration
> Capital Holdings Group (NSW) Pty Ltd
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> phone (02) 9955 8000 fax (02) 9955 8144
>
>
>
>
> Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 31/01/2003 02:49 PM
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Postfix vs Qmail
>
>
> <quote who="Stuart Guthrie">
>
> > What about Exim?
> >
> > http://www.exim.org/
> >
> > I've heard it's better than both postfix and qmail.
>
> "Different"... It's just another MTA. Whilst postfix is a drop-in
> replacement for sendmail, a lot of sendmail admins will find exim easier
> going, as it's a bit more hackable and flexible. You get used to that with
> sendmail. Exim documentation rocks way hard, and you can do some really
> funky stuff with it.
>
> If you're more anal-retentive, and like your systems clear-cut, ship-shape
> and so on, postfix is probably a better match. There are some things that
> are harder to do (wildly dynamic stuff isn't postfix's cup of tea), but
> it's
> well architected, and easy to understand.
>
> I personally prefer postfix for most tasks, but there are massive, million
> account systems running qmail, postfix, sendmail, exim, zmailer, courier,
> etc.
>
> Choosing the right one for your task is the cunning part.
>
> - Jeff
>
> --
> For a list of reasons why technology has failed to improve our lives,
> please press 3.
> --
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
--
Kevin Saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
