Do be honest Jon if you ever do what's proposed here (the bouncing) I would pay up and table a motion to have you removed from the SLUG mailing list,
you complain that you get some spam, and you have to pay for it.. awww poor you, you then end up paying probably 100 times as much generating crap like this and receiving crap like this back from list members.. if you dont like the list operating procedure get off the list... Dave. On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Jon Biddell wrote: > I've had it - deal with the SPAM issue at the next meeting - mind you, > I'd be interested to know how many "members" there are vs. how many > psople subscribed to the list that won't be represented, but never > mind.... > > SLUG had the future of being a great resource, except for the bitchiness > and backbiting of certain members (you know who you are)... You may > sleep well in the knowledge that you *may* have fscked it for all. > > As I have absolutely no doubt that my "suggestion" will be ignored / > voted down / whatever, I'm going to dseal with the spam in my own way. > > By bouncing each and every spam I receive from this list back to the > committee members... > > Not childish when you think of it - if it's only this way that they can > be "made aware" of their responsibilities, then so be it. > > Agree or don't - I don't give a fuck anymore... No, I'm not > subscribing, but I AM watching... > > -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / [EMAIL PROTECTED] pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
