** Reply to note from DaZZa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:55:50 +1000 (EST)
> This got stopped for a suspicious header. > > Hmm, what qualifies as a "suspicious header", please? I'll endeavour to > make sure I don't have one again. :-) DaZZa, guilty by association: I guess, it might have been a header from my original post: my mail client doesn't generate a message ID, that gets appended by the 1st MTA, and, I think that trips the 'inconpicous header parser'... sorry whilst on the subject of suspicious mails, spam, and the like: I finally flipped the switch to send my mail over to a RH/Postfix host, with some of the UCE /BL stuff enabled, only to find any traffic to me via the backup MX server, a teltra.net mail host gets bounced ny my own Postfix as the telstra host is apparently both an open relay, as well as, listed on spam cop...: Voytek Eymont Checked for Virus's by Asoft Email Scan -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
