On 04 Nov 2003 21:32:35 +1100 Bruce Badger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found that testing is the worst of both worlds (i.e. of stable & > unstable). It does not have the latest things, and it's not very > stable. Funny thing is, I have found just the opposite. Testing for me is perfect for both my laptops, my desktop and my wife's desktop. > Some things are missing altogether - e.g. there is no testing > version of GNUCash. Some things have large chunks missing (e.g. Gnome). Ahhh, but I don't use either GNUcash or Gnome (although I do use certain apps from GNOME). My machie are used mostly for developement work. > I find testing is the most challenging environment of the three. I used stable for a while but found it was too far behind the mainstream. I also tried unstable but found it too bleeding edge. Testing for me has worked really well for a number of years. I guess this is a case of different needs being met by different versions. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yes it's valid) +-----------------------------------------------------------+ The word "Windows" is a word out of an old dialect of the Apaches. It means: "White man staring through glass-screen onto an hourglass..." -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
