On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 13:48, Benno wrote: > Your users could then compile the software for their own use, and then have > and use something that is derived from a GPL, but that isn't really relevant > unless they want to release that binary, which they wouldn't be allowed to > do under the terms of how you license the source code to them.
Yes, that is one of the loopholes. Another common one attempted : Foo <- GPL. patch-for-foo <- proprietary client builds their own. This fails befcause patch-for-foo is a derivative as it's meaning is completely dependent on the source for Foo. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
