On Fri Dec 12, 2003 at 00:32:11 +1100, Ken Foskey wrote: >On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 23:46, Benno wrote: >> The part that particularly annoys me at the moment is the definition >> of derivative work. So if anyone feels like clarifying just jump right >> in. Its not a derivative work if you fork/exec something to interface >> with it, but if you dynamically link against it, it is. > >LGPL appears to be the best of both worlds to me. > >a) I can use it at work, ie link with proprietary. > >b) I am "forced" to release my patches so that others benefit.
Yeah, I have no issues with the LGPL :). Benno -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
