On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 14:35, Jan Schmidt wrote: > P.S. It appears to still require a limited-license binary firmware, and > doesn't have a lot of features finished yet, but it's a step upward from > having to load the windows driver using ndiswrapper.
ndiswrapper works fairly well though for basic infrastructure connections (I used it at LCA2004 with NO problems). I hope this project progresses further and faster though... Did you try it out? How did it compare against ndiswrapper? -- Simon Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
