Sorry forgot to include sluglist
Hmmm Didn't /. have something in about IBM filing for a decloratory
judgment
in the SCO case. Where the court will state that IBM didn't infringe on
SCO's
copyright through any linux activity. If IBM wins that case then SCO's
license
would be null envoid. Can anyone correct me if I am wrong.
Dear SLUG members,
After some lengthy negotiations, the Sydney Linux Users Group committee are
pleased to announce the availability of the SCO Intellectual Property
License
for Linux at a reduced rate for SLUG members.
Ordinarily, these licenses are $699 for a uniprocessor server, and $199 per
Linux desktop. As a special benefit for SLUG members, the reduced rate of
$698 per server and $198 per desktop is now available.
As many of you know, SCO have recently revealed that several lines of SCO
header files appear to have leaked into the Linux kernel, giving them
ownership of the entire code base. As such, the SCO Intellectual Property
License for Linux is now required in order to legally use a Linux system.
SLUG is very pleased to provide its members with the opportunity to become
SCOSource compliant, and the boss of SCO Australia and and New Zealand,
Kieran O'Shaughnessy, is reported to be "just this side of ecstatic" at the
opportunity to bring in some sales.
In order to assist SLUG members with taking advantage of this deal, we've
provided SCO Australia and New Zealand with a complete list of all our
members, and they'll be in touch with everyone soon!
Regards,
Jan Schmidt
SLUG President.
--
Jan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<stibbons> Yeah. The whole climax thing would make much more sense
if I'd paid attention.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
