On Wed, Jan 02, 2008, Alex Samad wrote: > sounds like xfs it is then .. of course, you could benchmark how it performs, you could try a few things, like "pull the power out whilst you're working on stuff" and see how jfs, xfs and ext3 hold up.
(Personal experience: xfs was nicer to use, ext3 is pretty nice nowdays compared to the rest and seems to handle bad power on consumer disks w/ no battery backed up RAID much better than the others. But this was all from my own personal experimenting from about 5 years ago; I'm not sure if things have changed substantially since then.) Adrian -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html