On Wed, Jan 02, 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
> sounds like xfs it is then

.. of course, you could benchmark how it performs, you could try
a few things, like "pull the power out whilst you're working on stuff"
and see how jfs, xfs and ext3 hold up.

(Personal experience: xfs was nicer to use, ext3 is pretty nice nowdays
compared to the rest and seems to handle bad power on consumer disks w/
no battery backed up RAID much better than the others. But this was all
from my own personal experimenting from about 5 years ago; I'm not
sure if things have changed substantially since then.)



Adrian

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to