On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:55:53PM +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008, Alex Samad wrote: > > sounds like xfs it is then > > .. of course, you could benchmark how it performs, you could try > a few things, like "pull the power out whilst you're working on stuff" > and see how jfs, xfs and ext3 hold up. sounds good, but now for this > > (Personal experience: xfs was nicer to use, ext3 is pretty nice nowdays > compared to the rest and seems to handle bad power on consumer disks w/ > no battery backed up RAID much better than the others. But this was all > from my own personal experimenting from about 5 years ago; I'm not > sure if things have changed substantially since then.)
I have formatted with xfs (I have a ups attached), will see how things go > > > > Adrian > > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
