Is it the O41072911.ROM?

Did you use flashrom of the dos disk thingo.

On 18 March 2014 14:06, gr0ve <gr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:
> Seriously, you should flash the BIOS!  I get 80mbps reads on ZFS
> and depending, 30-40mbps on writes.  Without the BIOS mod, you
> are getting only IDE speeds there.  The original BIOS holds this machine
> back and it is perfectly safe.  The BIOS ensures AHCI support is operational
> as well as the 3gbps SATA II bus. Once you see the improvement, you
> can choose to also select write cache enabled|disabled although
> this is best with a UPS ;)
>
>
> rachel
>
> --
> rachel polanskis
> <gr...@exemail.com.au>
>
>> On 18 Mar 2014, at 14:01, Jeff Allison <jeff.alli...@allygray.2y.net> wrote:
>>
>> I'm still running the stock bios, only have 3gb sata drives and no
>> ssd. so I felt staying stock was safer.
>>
>> I must have misconfigured something though 4MB/s is a joke.
>>
>>> On 18 March 2014 13:52, gr0ve <gr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:
>>> I have one of these.  Great machine.  I run FreeNAS on mine and use
>>> it as an ISCSI target for my esxi datastores and also as a NAS for my
>>> workstation automount.
>>>
>>> First question before we go any further on performance.   Have you
>>> installed the modified BIOS for this system from "thebay"?
>>>
>>> This mod enables full SATA performance for the system, enables hotswap
>>> drives and overall better IO perfomance with the existing hardware.
>>>
>>> If you have not done this mod yet, go here
>>>
>>> http://n40l.wikia.com/wiki/Bios
>>>
>>>
>>> and follow the instructions. If you need help, I have the image for the
>>>
>>> update handy. More extensive googling on HP N54L Bios will explain it for
>>> you.
>>>
>>>  If you have done the mod, you might need to check
>>>
>>> default blocksizes etc....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> rachel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> rachel polanskis
>>> <gr...@exemail.com.au>
>>>
>>> On 18 Mar 2014, at 13:28, Jeff Allison <jeff.alli...@allygray.2y.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK todays problem.
>>>
>>> I have a HP N54L Microserver running centos 6.5.
>>>
>>> In this box I have a 3x2TB disk raid 5 array, which I am in the
>>> process of extending to a 4x2TB raid 5 array.
>>>
>>> I've added the new disk --> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdb
>>>
>>> And grown the array --> mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --raid-devices=4
>>>
>>> Now the problem the resync speed is v slow, it refuses to rise above
>>> 5MB, in general it sits at 4M.
>>>
>>> from looking at glances it would appear that writing to the new disk
>>> is the bottle neck, /dev/sdb is the new disk.
>>>
>>> Disk I/O In/s Out/s
>>> md0 0 0
>>> sda1 0 0
>>> sda2 0 1K
>>> sdb1 3.92M 0
>>> sdc1 24.2M 54.7M
>>> sdd1 11.2M 54.7M
>>> sde1 16.3M 54.7M
>>>
>>> I partitiioned the disk with --> parted -a optimal /dev/sdb
>>>
>>> [root@nas ~]# parted -a optimal /dev/sdb
>>> GNU Parted 2.1
>>> Using /dev/sdb
>>> Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
>>> (parted) p
>>> Model: ATA ST2000DM001-1E61 (scsi)
>>> Disk /dev/sdb: 2000GB
>>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
>>> Partition Table: msdos
>>>
>>> Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
>>> 1 1049kB 2000GB 2000GB primary ntfs raid
>>>
>>> There is no ntfs filesystem on the disk, I've still not worked out how
>>> to remove that flag.
>>>
>>> I've followed the article here -->
>>> http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-raid-increase-resync-rebuild-speed.html
>>> to attempt to speed it up but no joy.
>>>
>>> iostat -x -m5 implies that the disk is at 100% when writing at 4.2
>>> MB/s, so there's something very wrong somewhere.
>>>
>>> Device:         rrqm/s   wrqm/s     r/s     w/s    rMB/s    wMB/s
>>> avgrq-sz avgqu-sz   await  svctm  %util
>>> sdb               0.00   711.20    0.00    8.40     0.00     4.20
>>> 1024.00    97.42 9441.55 119.05 100.00
>>>
>>> Any Ideas what I've done wrong?
>>>
>>> parted output
>>>
>>> [root@nas ~]# parted -l
>>> Model: ATA ST31000528AS (scsi)
>>> Disk /dev/sda: 1000GB
>>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
>>> Partition Table: msdos
>>>
>>> Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
>>> 1 1049kB 525MB 524MB primary ext4 boot
>>> 2 525MB 1000GB 1000GB primary lvm
>>>
>>> Model: ATA ST2000DM001-1E61 (scsi)
>>> Disk /dev/sdb: 2000GB
>>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
>>> Partition Table: msdos
>>>
>>> Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
>>> 1 1049kB 2000GB 2000GB primary ntfs raid
>>>
>>> Model: ATA ST2000DM001-9YN1 (scsi)
>>> Disk /dev/sdc: 2000GB
>>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
>>> Partition Table: msdos
>>>
>>> Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
>>> 1 1049kB 2000GB 2000GB primary raid
>>>
>>> Model: ATA WDC WD25EZRS-00J (scsi)
>>> Disk /dev/sdd: 2500GB
>>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
>>> Partition Table: msdos
>>>
>>> Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
>>> 1 1049kB 2000GB 2000GB primary ntfs raid
>>>
>>> Model: ATA ST2000DL001-9VT1 (scsi)
>>> Disk /dev/sde: 2000GB
>>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
>>> Partition Table: msdos
>>>
>>> Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
>>> 1 1049kB 2000GB 2000GB primary raid
>>> --
>>> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
>>> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to