Is "deterioration" a kinder way of saying "neglect"? ;)
Well, we *can *moan and criticise, but can anyone step up and give ye olde web page a shot in the arm? I'll bow up now as I am NOT a UI person. Hell, anything much beyond to command line is far to fancy for my taste! Just interested what the SLUG process is for getting the community engaged - this is obviously something we've noticed, and don't like, so how can we change it? -- James On 14 September 2015 at 06:31, Amos Shapira <amos.shap...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree the site doesn't give a great shot of confidence in Linux as a web > server, it doesn't render any page to completion for me. > > There is a link to "See the code" which points to > https://github.com/sydney-linux-user-group/slug/commits/master, where the > last commit happened over three years ago (29 May 2012), so perhaps it's > just a case of deterioration more than active change. > > --Amos > > On 9 September 2015 at 23:12, Heracles <herac...@iprimus.com.au> wrote: > > > I must congratulate the webmaster for turning an easy to navigate site > > into a nightmare. I know my system is a bit dated. (I am using Debian 8 > > with enlightenment e17 as a desktop.) > > I used to find it easy to navigate the SLUG Site, now I cant get past the > > front page - which is worse than useless! > > > > Heracles > > > > -- > > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > > > > > > -- > <http://au.linkedin.com/in/gliderflyer> > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html > -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
