On 09/06/2012 08:21 PM, Danny Auble wrote: > I just found and fixed this issue for 2.4.3. Patch > 45ea18c2103c44d0b5b0d4043090494d2d35a28b will fix it. It has to do with the > start time of the job being after the start time of the loop. The patch is > pretty simple and should work on any 2.4 system.
Danny,
Thank you very much for solving this annoying problem!!
Cheers,
-- Lennart Karlsson
UPPMAX, Uppsala University, Sweden
http://www.uppmax.uu.se
