-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19/08/13 19:21, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote:
> Will it be possible to do the opposite, i.e., allocate jobs to > nodes with the _fewest_ number of available CPUs? That is > something we would really like to see. (Our load is a combination > of single-threaded jobs and parallel jobs, so packing nodes as full > as possible keeps nodes free for jobs that need to use whole > nodes.) That would be of great interest to us as well; it would be similar in spirit to Moab's: NODEALLOCATIONPOLICY MINRESOURCE which we relied on to pack jobs onto nodes. All the best, Chris - -- Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlISv8sACgkQO2KABBYQAh8orwCghgMoHPGgVr+kOgsx/V/Kb7m/ HLsAn0uIIcT0syfROp5ZPX+ERHAjnXAv =BUcg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
