Does Hawking,Wet11,D-link or Superpass bridge more perform like a full bridge ??
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 12:18 AM To: Laurence Laforga Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Bandwidth Shaping - Wish List I'd like to see a aB that have a real bridge function in it. If they can manage to make the aP's client bridge work correctly why can't they make the the aB firmware bridge correctly ? The old firmware did bridge correctly but limited to 1 mac only. Sucks to have to run the old firmware to get a real bridge (and lose remote management) or to pay the extra money and use a aP in client bridge mode. Consider all the lame responses I heard from sB I understand that they have no interest in fixing this problem. Why would they want to they get more money out of me since I am forced to purchase a aP and use it in client bridge mode that works correctly while maintaining the ability to do remote management of the unit.. Best regards, Eje Gustafsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 620-231-4066 - Your Full Time Professionals - eBay UserID : macahan --- searchable smartBridges mailing list archive. http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/ -- LL> The thread mentions that the APPOs will be upgradable to handle LL> bandwidth management..... >> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not LL> understand >> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. >> >> >> Personally I'm going to wait and get the nexuses in 2 months or so I LL> can >> survive for that lil bit of time without any more bwmgmt than I have LL> now >> (crappy e-bwmgr) and then when the simpletraps come out ill buy all LL> new ap's >> and use my current ap's as client bridges. >> >> >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> _____ >> >> From: Laurence Laforga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:27 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> Just wondering where we are with this issue? I've been wrestling LL> with some >> options, in particular purchasing Brilan to do the bandwidth >> management....but if the APPs will be able to do it then I'd rather LL> spend >> the extra cash on purchasing another APPO. >> >> >> >> Laurence >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LL> 15.org] >> On Behalf Of Nish Park >> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 6:37 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [smartBridges] Bandwidth Shaping - Wish List >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> >> >> As mentioned a few times on this list, we are currently developing LL> the >> Bandwidth Management function for our airPoint Pro products. We have LL> a base >> set of functionality defined and I would like to get some input from LL> the >> user community on the Wish List. Can we have a brainstroming thread LL> to flush >> out the ideas. >> >> >> >> Please post your wish list of what you would like to see for LL> Bandwidth >> Shaping in the airPoint Pro. Thanks. >> >> >> >> Nish >> >> >> >> >> LL> Laurence Laforga LL> President LL> TIRGON Communications LL> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List LL> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe LL> smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LL> (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) LL> Archives: http://198.63.203.6 LL> --- LL> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://198.63.203.6 The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://198.63.203.6
