Good point, my bad.  But still, they route correctly...  So issue still 
stands, AP and Bridge on same subnet, (DHCP is also on 192 subnet..) so 
what am I missing?



-----Original Message-----
From: "Scott Damron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:34:29 -0700
Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and 
Lossofassociation

> The new Airbridges are not transparent.
> 
> Scott
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shoffman
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and
> Lossofassociation
> 
> 
> Alex,
> 
> IP conflicts?  Really?
> 
> Ok  exploring that concept.  We hard code SB device IP's to 
> 192.168.101.0/24 addresses, and the AP's (Cisco) are on the same subnet
> (192.168.101.0/24.  All transparent.  User's systems are using DHCP to
> a
> 
> public IP 68.88.28.0/23.
> 
> Where is there an IP conflict?
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "sB Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:01:27 +0800
> Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and Loss 
> ofassociation
> 
> > I believe it is true but what cause it to happen is a mystery. What I
> > can think of possibility is IP conflict between 2 devices and corrupt
> > the other one.
> > 
> > It is fine to turn off airBridge together when the PC is turned off. 
> > But it is all user preference. It doesn't matter anything.
> > 
> > Alex
> > sB Tech Support
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam
> > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:00 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and Loss 
> > ofassociation
> > 
> > 
> > Alex,
> > 
> > I know it may seem hard to believe, but this is exactly what is 
> > happening to my customers. And in three of the four cases I guarantee
> > you the customer is not changing the ESSID from logan-wt to the 
> > gibberish that I
> > 
> > find when I arrive on site. And the fourth person, while I wouldn't 
> > bet my life on it, I'd bet a considerable amount of money he's not 
> > changing it either. (When I dropped into a DOS prompt he thought his 
> > monitor was going
> > out since part of the screen turned black). So I am closer to 100%
> than
> > 99% certain that he's not changing it.
> > 
> > 
> > One is using Windows 95 (I know...supposedly not supported but it
> does
> 
> > work. I have three customers using it, and the other two are fine,
> but
> 
> > going off a different AP. The simplemonitor software won't run on it,
> > but the airbridge works with it.) So I know she's not changing the 
> > ESSID. I set it for her using my laptop. The firmware is 1.50.
> > 
> > One is using Millenium. She doesn't have the SB software on her PC.
> So
> 
> > I
> > 
> > know she isn't changing the ESSID. Again, I set this with my laptop,
> > firmware 1.50.
> > 
> > One is using Windows 98 SE. He has the software but doesn't have a 
> > clue how to open it or log into the AB. He also hae 1.50 firmware.
> > 
> > And the last guy is using a Linksys router on a Macintosh network. He
> > obvisouly doesn't have the software on there either. So he's not
> > changing 
> > the ESSID. I had 1.50 firmware on him, but have backreved him to
> 1.43.
> 
> > We're monitoring that to see if that fixes it. (This guy is using and
> > ABO. 
> > The other three are using airbridge indoor units.
> > 
> > All four of these people are on the same access point. None of the 
> > people on my other access point have ever had this happen. All of 
> > these people have great LQ and RSSI. (People with far less LQ and
> RSSI
> 
> > are not seeing
> > 
> > this.)
> > 
> > If I have to roll back to any of these sites again I'll take the 1.43
> > firmware with me and backrev it to see if that's what's causing it. I
> > doubt that it is however as their are customers on my other AP that
> are
> > using 1.50 and not seeing this. I'm thinking it's got to be something
> > inside the indoor airbridges that cause this.
> > 
> > If the customers were to power off their airbridges each night, that
> > shouldn't hurt anything, should it? Should I tell them to leave them
> on
> > all the time? (Many of them might, but they aren't going to leave
> their
> > PCs on. And i wouldn't think they'd need to leave the airbridges on 
> > either, but I thought I'd ask.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Sam
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, sB Tech Support wrote:
> > 
> > > We do not see the logic or any possibility that the ESSID could be
> > > changed by itself without anybody changing its conifg, either
> > possible
> > 
> > > of hacking or the security being compromised. But still we will do
> a
> > > research on this.
> > > 
> > > About the inactivity for 5 minutes, after the client devices
> > > associated with an access point, it monitors the signal strength
> and
> 
> > > the traffic in order to keeps the link going. When there is no
> > traffic
> > 
> > > passed between the client devices and the access point for more
> than
> > 5
> > 
> > > minutes, the client device becomes idle but REMAIN associated. Once
> > > the traffic is kicked in, it will "wake up" again and start talking
> > to
> > 
> > > the access point.
> > > 
> > > During this re-initiation process with the access point if the RSSI
> > > and Link Quality is not sufficient enough to establish the link it 
> > > will disassociate with the access point and search for a better 
> > > signal, but eventually will associate to the access point.
> > > 
> > > Alex
> > > sB Tech Support
> > >  
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shoffman
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:29 AM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and 
> > > Lossofassociation
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Alex,
> > > 
> > > This is what we were told before.  We monitored the association
> from
> > > the
> > > 
> > > Cisco AP.  As I stated, we did see it dis-associate, and y'all 
> > > (SmartBridge tech Support) confirmed that inactivity for a period
> of
> > 5
> > 
> > > minutes will cause the unit to disassociate.
> > > 
> > > The ESSIS was always hard-coded, and the BSSID was set both to
> > 0000000
> > > (however many) and with Hard code of the BSSID for the AP.  Issue
> > > persisted in either case.  So we implemented the pings, and that
> > cleared
> > > 
> > > up the problem.  We are now doing SNMP monitoring of the untis and
> > > have
> > > sinced turned off the pings (the SNMP gets are keeping the
> connection
> > > alive...)
> > > 
> > > Scott
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Alex Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 19:36:26 +0800
> > > Subject: RE: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and Loss 
> > > ofassociation
> > > 
> > > > Scott,
> > > > 
> > > > When client computer turned on, how do you tell the association
> is
> > > > not
> > > 
> > > > there? If the TXRX LED is solid, it is indicating associated. Can
> > > > check them out of happen again? Also, do you hardcode the ESSID, 
> > > > or set as ANY? If it is any, the airBridge can associate to any 
> > > > AP.
> > When
> > > > the problem happen, does anybody does the restore to default
> > causing
> > 
> > > > the ESSID to ANY (unless you have used simpleDeploy for default
> > > > config).
> > > > 
> > > > If the problem persists, please let us know and I would like you 
> > > > to send
> > > > to us directly for analysis.   
> > > > 
> > > > Alex
> > > > sB Tech Support
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shoffman
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:49 AM
> > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > Subject: Fwd: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and 
> > > > Loss ofassociation
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Alex,
> > > > 
> > > > Agreed on power supply, especially in light of the Onion report.
> > We
> > > > have 50 installed from that batch you guys are dealing with.  We
> > > > haven't had any "total" dead, but one may have a heat problem.  
> > > > (replacing it today...  stays good for about 60 minutes, then
> > looses
> > 
> > > > association.
> > > > Restart, nothing.  Turn it down..  wait about 10 minutes.. 
> > > > turn-up, bang,
> > > > back on air.. for about 1 hour or so...    (some times shorter). 
> > We
> > > > will
> > > > do some in house checking before we attempt an RMA...)
> > > > 
> > > > But back to the original, We have done our best (except putting a
> > > > UPS
> > > > or
> > > > 
> > > > larger power supply on the power shot)to clean up the power, but
> > > > given
> > > 
> > > > it
> > > > is a rural install, power may not be totally clean.   But what
> > leads
> > > us
> > > > to our theory is that this only happened when the client computer
> > was
> > > > turned off at night (or during the day).   The AB was never
> pwoered
> > > > off,
> > > > 
> > > > but when clients computer turned on.. Association was not there.
> > We
> > > > go out and reset the jibberish in the ESSID, and walla, back up 
> > > > and happy.
> > > > 
> > > > Again, another point leading us to believe our theory is that 
> > > > since we started the pining (3 weeks ago) we have never heard
> from
> 
> > > > client again
> > > 
> > > > (i.e. its staying solid...)  So...  go figure.
> > > > 
> > > > Scott
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: "Alex Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:17:51 +0800
> > > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and Loss of
> > > > association
> > > > 
> > > > It could be the noisy power source or some spike that cause the
> > > > memory
> > > 
> > > > to corrupt. Check if there is proper grounding and clean power
> > > > supply.
> > > > 
> > > > Alex
> > > > sB Tech Support
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam
> > > > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:04 PM
> > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and Loss of
> > > > association
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > No, this isn't what happened. There is no software on these
> > > > computers
> > > > for the person to be able to log into the airbridge with. I have
> to
> > > > take my laptop to them and login to the AB and reassociate it
> > myself.
> > > > 
> > > > Can anyone at SB shed light on this?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Sam
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  On Mon, 23
> > > > Jun 2003, phantam wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I HAVE seen this whenever I do a remote essid change and it
> > fails,
> > > > > maybe the text isn't being sent properly but in this case it
> > messes
> > > > up
> > > > 
> > > > > quite often. Once it messed up and I could swear it was screwed
> > up
> > > > but
> > > > 
> > > > > they reset it and it associated properly I don't know if it
> just
> > > > > was
> > > 
> > > > > sent properly but not associated or it's a messed up command 
> > > > > that the unit has to be rebooted after a essid change and it 
> > > > > doesn't
> > do
> > 
> > > > > it properly.
> > > > > 
> > > > > What could this be seeni?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Chris
> > > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:32 AM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > 
> > > > > One thing I don't do, is install any utility that allows them
> to
> > > > > get
> > > 
> > > > > involved in any way with the radio gear. The less they know the
> > > > better
> > > > 
> > > > > we all are. Of course we always retain ownership of the radio.
> I
> 
> > > > > even do that with the gateway router in most cases, even though
> > they
> > > > do
> > > > > buy that from me.
> > > > > In most cases all we have to do is tell them to reboot their
> pc,
> > > > gateway
> > > > > router, or radio when they stop working.
> > > > > George
> > > > > 
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Tom Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 9:28 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and Loss 
> > > > > of association
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Have you seen an AP with the ESSID of ZUCimkXZ while doing
> any
> 
> > > > > > installs or war driving? Do these customers who had issues 
> > > > > > have access to
> > > > > simpleMonitor
> > > > > > and if so are they the type who might have played with the
> > radio
> > > > > > in an attempt to "fix" the connection?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have one who thinks they know more about our system than we
> > do
> > > > and
> > > > 
> > > > > > they are always causing me issues by screwing around with all
> > > > > > their settings. They are not using anything from smartBridge,
> > but
> > > > > > another radio I no
> > > > > longer
> > > > > > use. I guess I don't charge enough to go clean up their
> messes
> 
> > > > > > when they
> > > > > get
> > > > > > good and drunk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 23:28
> > > > > > Subject: [smartBridges] Weird Characters in ESSID and Loss of
> > > > association
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tonight I went to two of my customer's homes to
> re-associate
> > > > their
> > > > 
> > > > > > > airbridges. When I got there the ESSID had changed from
> > > > > > > logan-wt
> > > 
> > > > > > > to something like ZUCimkXZ and the BSSID was all zeros.
> > > > > > > Earlier
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > weekend
> > > > > > > another customer with an airbridge outdoor had the same 
> > > > > > > thing happen.
> > > > > His
> > > > > > > ESSID changed from logan-wt to some jumble of letters.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Got any idea what is causing this to happen? There are
> about
> > > > > > > 30
> > > > > > > people
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > that AP (logan-wt). All three of these people are on the 
> > > > > > > logan-wt AP. As far as I know they are the only three that
> > lost
> > > > > > > association, but this is the third time in a month or so 
> > > > > > > that
> > > > it's
> > > > 
> > > > > > > happened. Are these defective Airbridges? Their RSSI is > 
> > > > > > > 50% and the Link quality is close to 80%.
> > > > > They
> > > > > > > are at most six miles from the AP, and one of them is only
> a
> 
> > > > > > > couple of miles away from the AP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Should I get an rma for these or do you think there is
> > > > > > > something
> > > 
> > > > > > > else causing this? They are all using 1.50 of the firmware,
> > > > though
> > > > 
> > > > > > > I did have the man with the outdoor airbridge backrev to 
> > > > > > > 1.43 to
> > > 
> > > > > > > see if that will help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > Sam Morris, Owner
> > > > > > > Loganet Internet Service
> > > > > > > Logan IA
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> > > > > > > subscribe
> > > > > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type 
> > > > > > > unsubscribe
> > > > > > smartBridges)
> > > > > > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> > subscribe
> > > > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> > > > unsubscribe
> > > > > smartBridges)
> > > > > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> subscribe
> 
> > > > > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove:
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > (in
> > > > 
> > > > > the body type unsubscribe
> > > > > smartBridges)
> > > > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe 
> > > > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (in
> > > 
> > > > the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > > 
> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe 
> > > > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (in
> > > 
> > > > the body type unsubscribe
> > > > smartBridges)
> > > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > > 
> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe 
> > > > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (in
> > > 
> > > > the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > > 
> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe 
> > > > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (in
> > > 
> > > > the body type unsubscribe
> > > > smartBridges)
> > > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > 
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (in
> > 
> > > the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > 
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (in
> > 
> > > the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe 
> > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (in
> 
> > the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://198.63.203.6
> > 
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe 
> > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (in
> 
> > the body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> 
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in
> the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  
> 
> 
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to