Sounds like a good idea then, well 100mw isn't true but 250mw on the nexus's should rock :)
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Eje Gustafsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:55 AM
To: Jerry Carter
Actually none are 100mw some of the units claim 100mw EIRP (including
gain from the 2.2dB rubber antenna the indoor units comes with).
But ALL their radios are actually 60mw with -94 1MB recv sensitivity
(no radio is better then another even though they claim -96 and -107
for some on their website but that is with antenna gain ADDED ie -94 +
2dB and -94 + 12dB)
As for Chris suggestion of powershot. This is how Trango does it with
their "junktionbox" as they call it.
http://www.trangobroadband.com/products/list.cfm
scroll down until you get to the Power over Ethernet J-Box
it has 2 LEDs one showing power and one showing ODU link (that the
cable between it and the radio is there and radio is powered up).
Best regards,
Eje Gustafsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com
Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 620-231-4066
- Your Full Time Professionals -
eBay UserID : macahan
---
searchable smartBridges mailing list archive.
http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/
--
JC> I thought all airbridges were 100mw? I guess I should go read the website or
JC> something..lol
JC> ----- Original Message -----
JC> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JC> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JC> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:57 PM
JC> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Poll .....Is New sBridge Equipment Reliable?
>> On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Jayson Wiceguy wrote:
>> > please answer yes or no if you have NOT had problems of any kinds.
>>
>> I have a limited number of ABOs in the field, about a dozen or so. Other
>> than the power output being low, 65mw vs 100mw of the homebrew Cisco CPEs
>> we have out there, these things have been good. I have had a few with
>> loose N connectors, but that can be fixed with a twist of a wrench. I
>> recently deployed an AirBridge indoor on a new network (new job, long
>> story) and it would lock up every two days. Replaced it with a WET11, and
>> the link has been solid.
>>
>> All in all, my experience with SmartBridges reliability has been pretty
JC> good.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
JC> smartBridges <yournickname>
>> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
JC> smartBridges)
>> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>>
JC> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
JC> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
JC> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
JC> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
--
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
