John, You are using the Linksys WET11s, with maybe the Nexrad directional? how are they working for you?
Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Poll .....Is New sBridge Equipment Reliable? > Actually, I am packing up all but two airbridges that I had in the field to > go back to airbrideg. I have about 150 WET11's in the firld and the run like > champs. My Airbridge access points seem solid, but customer outdoor units > are not in my bus plan anymore. > > hope this helps > > John Mooring > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Email > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Poll .....Is New sBridge Equipment Reliable? > > > jparr > radio output > > 100mw with a 2.2 db antenna figured in > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Carter > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Poll .....Is New sBridge Equipment Reliable? > > > I thought all airbridges were 100mw? I guess I should go read the website or > something..lol > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:57 PM > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Poll .....Is New sBridge Equipment Reliable? > > > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Jayson Wiceguy wrote: > > > please answer yes or no if you have NOT had problems of any kinds. > > > > I have a limited number of ABOs in the field, about a dozen or so. Other > > than the power output being low, 65mw vs 100mw of the homebrew Cisco CPEs > > we have out there, these things have been good. I have had a few with > > loose N connectors, but that can be fixed with a twist of a wrench. I > > recently deployed an AirBridge indoor on a new network (new job, long > > story) and it would lock up every two days. Replaced it with a WET11, and > > the link has been solid. > > > > All in all, my experience with SmartBridges reliability has been pretty > good. > > > > Jeremy > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
