**OPINION** In my opinion, crappy or if you prefer, bad radios are ones that just spray frequency all over the place without focus, and possibly have lots of sidebands and noise. Good radios have a good control over channels, don't bleed into other channels when set to a specific one or when hopping, don't hop into 2 or 3 channels instead of just one. **OPINION**
Scott -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Genovesi Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Combined power of radio/antenna At 12:02 PM 9/3/2003 -0700, you wrote: >Possibly and maybe why we are seeing problems? but I also agree >sometimes you need an amp when the circumstances warrant it.If you use >crappy radios sure its going to cause tons of problems. If amps were >bad no one would make them they are made for a reason.. Can someone clarify on the difference between "good" and "crappy" radios? It's my understanding that this is how "cleanly" the radio outputs energy - is this determined using a spectrum analyzer? Does anyone have any examples "good" and "crappy" radio signatures? Just trying to add to my own knowledge base here ... TIA, Rob ----------ANNOUNCEMENT---------- Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org ----------ANNOUNCEMENT---------- Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
