Dude,sorry I found it! :) Thanx,
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: Re: [smartBridges] RSSI Percentages > The percentage is usable, but you can't reference it to an accurate dbm > value, or compare it to other gear (Aironet, Lucent) One of the SB Techs > posted a whitepaper from WildPackets a few months back explaining it after > lots of collective noise was made regarding the inaccuracys. > > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Dennis Burgess wrote: > > > I have heard of people saying that the RSSI in the ABOs is really not a valid method of determing a link. What are good values to put in ? > > > > Dennis > > > > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT---------- > Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV > http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT---------- Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
