Well, Don't know about clients hanging off the APPo1 (which I assume is the master) why they wouldn't work. But I wonder if by disallowing interclient on Appo2 and appo3 doesn't disallow clients on those from talking with the Appo1? But that would be ludicrous design now wouldn't it for a repeater function.... *shrug*
Love Cisco AP's (sorry, never had to deal with that) scott -----Original Message----- From: "The Wirefree Network" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:27:51 -0800 Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking > I have: > > <--> aPindoor/aPPo2 <--> > clients > T-1 Router <--> switch <--> aPPo1 <--> clients > <--> aPindoor/aPPo3 <--> > clients > > > Not only my head end aPPo, but both repeating aPPos are set to disallow > client2client comm. All works well. > > Sully > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking > > Let me rephrase.... > > If I disable client-2-client communication, none of my clients can see > *anything* ..including the Internet!! No surfing, no email, no P2P, no > nothing! All they can see is the AP and that's it. IIRC, I can't even > ping > their radios any more. > > Thoughts? > > TIM > > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > From: "Breiland, Derek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:59:34 -0600 > > >Yes, to disable client to client disables all clients. There is no > ability > >to pick and choose specific clients. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:10 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Inter Client Comms blocking > > > >Hate to bring up an old subject like this, but any time I disable > >client-2-client communication on my aPPOs, it stops *all* client > >communication. They're still associated to the unit, but they can't > pass > >traffic. I forget the version of the FW I'm running, but it's from > March > >or so. > > > >Any suggestions? > > > >TIM > > Tim Foster > www.AledoBroadBand.com > Aledo's only high-speed ISP > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
