Whatever you say. ;)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Demarc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:50 PM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] NetStumbler


Scott

This is 100% NOT true the SMC card IS NOT I repeat is NOT a 200mW card any
body that is will to do the test will see that this card
is 100mW and some times even less also the RX levels are not the same. I
want to be clear Zcom in TW is where SMC get the cards
from, they get the bottom of the barrel cards that did not pass the tests
both Zcomax(US) and Demarc require which is truly 200mW.
SMC has is blowing smoke on this, hell I even has a call from an SMC
engineer asking us where we get our cards from! Anyway bottom
line you get what you pay for and at $60 its not a true 200mW card, also its
not FCC certified like Demarcs:
http://www.demarctech.com/products/reliawave-rwz/qgk-dt200-grant.pdf

Don't get me wrong for $60 is a good card with external connectors, but do
not be making false statements like this with out getting
your fact straight.

Sincerely,  Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 908-996-7995 Fax: 908-847-0202
http://www.demarctech.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Scott
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] NetStumbler


No problem, no apologies needed ;)

A lot of people were confused on Broadbandreports.com about this very thing
so we had a pretty good thread about it including
pictures.  I'd just hate to see people spend the $25 on a pigtail only to
find out it's the incorrect one (which I have done before
for a different device).  As a side note, for those that don't know, the SMC
Elite Connect high power card is a re-branded Z-comax
card.  The Demarc cards are also the exact same thing, except they are $150
where the SMC is $60.  As you can see, the SMC is a
smokin' deal considering what you get.

Scott
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Gloria Vester
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 6:27 PM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] NetStumbler


Sorry, I meant RP-MMCX, was just trying to help in noting the style of the
connector.

Sorry,
Gloria

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Scott
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 6:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] NetStumbler

The SMC card has an RP-MMCX, not MMCX.  A regular MMCX pigtail will fit into
the socket, but then you are connecting center pin to
center pin, not center pin to center receptacle.  You may still get
connection by using a MMCX pigtail and not ever notice the
difference, but it isn't a proper match.  HTH.


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

Reply via email to