> On Jul 21, 2015, at 12:25 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi everybody! > > My SSD cache partition has a (obviously wrong) size of 16E. More worrying to > me is, however, that alloc is more than twice the size. I saw this was fixed > in https://www.illumos.org/issues/5701; yet I'm still seeing this. Is it > related to the fact, that I'm using partitions on the same SSD? > > Second question: the budget and hardware permits only one SSD, which I'm > using for both log and cache. What's your stand on this - I did a lot of > reading, but didn't get a clear picture of how bad it is...
It isn't bad, it will function as designed. By default, the L2ARC write load is quite small, so the log workload is unlikely to be impacted. -- richard > > Thanks for your help/advise! > Manuel > > # uname -v > joyent_20150709T171818Z > > # zpool list -v zones > NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP > HEALTH ALTROOT > zones 7,27T 2,29T 4,97T - 11% 31% 1.00x > ONLINE - > raidz2 7,27T 2,29T 4,97T - 11% 31% > c0t5000C5007A6FDE49d0 - - - - - - > c0t5000C5007A6FDFD3d0 - - - - - - > c0t5000C5007A6FB12Ad0 - - - - - - > c0t5000C5007A6FD39Ad0 - - - - - - > log - - - - - - > c3t0d0p1 9,25G 1,10M 9,25G - 77% 0% > cache - - - - - - > c3t0d0p2 55,9G 148G 16,0E - 0% 265% > ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
