> On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:55 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Thank you Richard. > > I have, however, still the issue with the wrongly sized cache. > > cache - - - - - - > c3t0d0p2 55,9G 148G 16,0E - 0% 265% > > Does/Did anybody else experience this? How did you solve it?
oh, that is a bug in the accounting. https://www.illumos.org/issues/5701 <https://www.illumos.org/issues/5701> this fix is in the illumos-joyent source, so perhaps you can try the latest version? -- richard > > And I forgot to add in the previous mail: yes, I'm running two KVM (Windows > and BSD), and three zones. The log helps greatly here. > > Thanks > Manuel > >> On 21.07.2015, at 16:09, Richard Elling <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 12:25 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> Hi everybody! >>> >>> My SSD cache partition has a (obviously wrong) size of 16E. More worrying >>> to me is, however, that alloc is more than twice the size. I saw this was >>> fixed in https://www.illumos.org/issues/5701; yet I'm still seeing this. Is >>> it related to the fact, that I'm using partitions on the same SSD? >>> >>> Second question: the budget and hardware permits only one SSD, which I'm >>> using for both log and cache. What's your stand on this - I did a lot of >>> reading, but didn't get a clear picture of how bad it is... >> >> It isn't bad, it will function as designed. By default, the L2ARC write load >> is quite small, >> so the log workload is unlikely to be impacted. >> -- richard > > ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
