Hello,
thanks for the answer
Selon Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <mic...@vanille-media.de>:
> Am Thursday 05 February 2009 11:48:03 schrieb Alain2210:
> > 1) for fso do you prefer using the standard modem files the most or to
> > adapt it the most to each model (the both solutions have pro and con) ?
> > That is, to be more precise, is it good to send commands like ATZ that ezx
> > does not accept, but, for which, ezx answers only an error which does not
> > matter ?
>
> This has to be decided on a case-by-case basis. It doesn't bother me too much
> that some commands in the init sequence are not understood by EZX. In general
> I try to use custom commands only if they provide a real additional value --
> such as the %CPI in the Calypso model.
Understood.
>
> > 2) ezx does not accept at+cpin?, so it seems that the only solution is to
> > use the status variable insteed. It can only be a problem if frameworkd is
> > launched again after the sim has been unlocked. But is it a real problem ?
>
> I don't think it matters too much. Frameworkd tries hard to power off all
> devices when it shuts down, so on every startup should behave like all
> devices had been shut down.
So there would be an easy solution to make SimGetAuthStatus work for EZX.
I will retest it.
>
> I must admit ogsmd has largely been influenced by the way the TI Calypso
> handles all that -- naturally, since it was the first modem that was
> supported. Other models behave differently, such as inherently autoregister,
> once you unlock the PIN. I'm open to changing the default behaviour to suit
> the majority of supported devices, adding exceptions for the minority.
>
> I'm also open to changing semantics of the interface, if you have good
> reasoning. So... lets try to make it run well on EZX! :)
I'm trying to understand the (complex) DeviceSetAntennaPower :
1) why do you use CPIN? two times and did not use SimGetAuthStatus ? I would be
easier to adapt for EZX.
2) Moreover why is the state of SIM important for Antenna ?
3) In specs, I have seen that SetAntennaPower('False') is possible. But for me,
it did not work (of course, I can have done a mistake). I will retest.
Thanks,
Alain
_______________________________________________
Smartphones-userland mailing list
Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
