Hi there! On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:14:44 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: > arne anka a écrit : >>> I found it quite slow but still usable. YMMV. >>> I'd welcome any patch to the package to improve its usability. >> >> no patch, i simply build navit with the options below added to the >> configure line in debian/rules (most notably the CCFLAGS, taken from the >> navit wiki). >> >> CCFLAGS="-march=armv4t -mtune=arm920t" > > I guess these flags can't be used for all debian armel boxes because of > the wide variety of ARM chips. Is that right?
Right. > If so, and in case these flags significantly improve usability, would it > be appropriate to add openmoko specific binary packages such as > navit-openmoko and so on? I think we need numbers to decide if it is worth having an Openmoko-specific package. However, I am strong opponent to such actions, since this would end up in more and more packages optimized for the Openmoko, which is beyond the scope of the pkg-fso team (at least how I see it). Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpWFUhIQoDNP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Smartphones-userland mailing list Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
