On 12/12/11 10:14 AM, Jordan Brown wrote:
On 12/12/11 09:59, Liane Praza wrote:
On 12/12/11 9:30 AM, Jordan Brown wrote:
Is there any reason why property-level validation shouldn't be every
time a property gets set?
Interactively would be OK, I think, and I expect we'll do that at some
point. Chose not to do so for scripted invocations of svccfg earlier
in S11
due to not wanting to break scripts.
(Templates did make things stricter than they used to be.)
Sure... but isn't a script that sets a value that's not allowed by the
template broken? Breaking broken scripts doesn't bother me at all...
I suppose a non-broken script might delete a required value and then
recreate it.
How about property-level and instance-level validation at refresh time?
(In particular, before that part of refresh that commits the current
snapshot.)
Yes, there are many such enhancements that are being considered.
liane
_______________________________________________
smf-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
