That is true. aj ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Hopper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "The Sandbox Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 4:45 PM Subject: Re: [Sndbox] 2nd Wives
> Ditto..... > > If you don't take the "baggage" into account and deal with it before hand, > your asking for trouble later. Thinking there is no "baggage" is just > begging for trouble..... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "The Sandbox Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Sndbox] 2nd Wives > > > > It has some merit..but the people involved have to > > realize that these people did not start to exist the > > day that they go together. That there were others in > > their past and in a lot of cases will always be there. > > The mother of the child is not going to disappear and > > it is better if they can all work together for the > > betterment of the family as a whole. The child will > > play the parents against each other, and the dad > > against the new wife if they can..and that has to be > > addressed as well. > > > > but if the union is strong and the people involved > > realize the pitfalls and work to maintain the > > relationship, it will survive. Too many times people > > go into a new relationship with demands based on an > > old one...and not realistically dealing with the new > > person as that...a new person...not without all that > > crap that the last person threw at them. > > > > Laurie > > > > ________________________________ > > Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net ________________________________ Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
