Thats not what I was saying. I was just saying that's how he could have fed it. I didnt say it was right, just that was one way he could do it. I think if he could afford to feed the tiger (and did it ever mention exactly where he got it from) then he could afford to pay his own rent, buy his own food, etc..
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Charles
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:12 AM
To: 'The Sandbox Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Man Kept Tiger In Public Housing

So it's OK for him to live in public housing while wasting money feeding an animal that didn't belong in a home to begin with.....I'm sorry I just can't buy it.  He defrauded the taxpayers of NYC.
 
Charles Mims
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angela
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 7:22 AM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Man Kept Tiger In Public Housing

Well ya know if he managed to get say $300 a month, he could have been feeding himself on 50-100 and spending the rest on the tiger. I know if I lived alone, I'd probably only spend around 50-100/month feeding myself.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Greg Hopper
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:31 PM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Man Kept Tiger In Public Housing

True, he could have been buying packs of meat ( to feed the tiger )with food stamps and starving himself lol Who knows about some folks... 
----- Original Message -----
From: Angela
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:18 PM
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Man Kept Tiger In Public Housing

And didnt Laurie say he was probably feeding the tiger with his foodstamps. Or he could have been catching stray cats in the neighborhood and feeding them to it, hehe
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Charles
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:58 PM
To: 'The Sandbox Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Man Kept Tiger In Public Housing

Which is all beside the point.  The point is that the taxpayers of NYC were footing the bill for the rent of a man who could obviously afford to pay his own rent.  He was feeding wild animals for Pete's sake.  Probably the food bill for the tiger alone would pay a very large portion of rent in a normal priced city.  I would imagine feeding a tiger would take several hundred dollars a month.
 
Charles Mims
 
 
________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to