Apparently the nurses that did the initial
exam weren't convinced she was raped. The initial hearing is always a bit
unfair. The prosecution presents its evidence, but the defense
cannot. So for a few months the prosecution's side is the only one that is
heard. Which is really why I failed to understand why the defense team
requested this hearing. Remember...they asked for it.
Charles Mims
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Angela
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:28 AM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Breaking on the news...
Did
you hear the questions Bryants attorney asked yesterday? Something to do if the
bruising and such in her genital area was consistent with having sex with 3
different people in 3 days?
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Charles
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:12 AM
To: 'The Sandbox Discussion List'
Subject: [Sndbox] Breaking on the news...The nurses that examined Bryant's accuser said that the marks on her did not corroborate her story of assault but were consistent with consensual sex. I bet the prosecution would have liked for them not to include that in their reports.Charles Mims
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
