Yes, it could be rape. But at the same
time, it could have been the other fellow who did leave semen in her
drawers. Hence the concept reasonable doubt. I don't think his semen
being there or not exonerates him, but it does leave enough room for any
reasonable person to doubt.
Charles Mims
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Oh my!
Ok *if* this is true...I would say he's a innocent guy no? I had leaned toward gulity but wouldn't this seem to say he were innocent if true?
if being the key word but heres a question if theres no semen at all why did he admit to sleeping with her? my point being if theres none at all and he admitted consensual couldnt there be none and it be rape too?
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
