|
If so, your right...the judge is
giving them umpteen reasons to appeal.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:17
PM
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Defense Accused of
Smearing Victim
The defense just filed a motion (that
makes it all official) that there is compelling evidence that supports
Bryant's innocence and are asking the judge for permission to present
it. I'm betting, given the past rulings from this judge that the
permission will be denied and that will be yet one more bullet for
appeal.
Charles
Mims
Maybe, but my point was the
article was wrong.....if the info was correct.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:00
PM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Defense Accused
of Smearing Victim
In a message dated 10/15/2003
12:59:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
My point was if the
information was correct, it wasn't a attempt to "smear" her by asking what
they did...merely speaking the truth.
but the article said it was a misreprensentation
so until its entered into actual evidence that cant be disputed its all
hearsay aint it?
________________________________
Changes to your subscription
(unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your subscription
(unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
