Sure it is a possibility. I suppose
what swayed me wasn't the testimony, but the testimony on the physical
evidence. The DNA and pubic hair belonging to another man is what pushed
me over to the other side.
The prosecution said they didn't put their
best case forward...that may be, but that's pretty much unheard of, especially
in a high profile case where the media is in a frenzy. Is it possible the
prosecutors are dolts? Maybe. I won't deny that.
I also saw on the news this morning they
didn't even take any forensic evidence from the bathroom she said she cleaned up
in. That may come back to haunt them also.
Charles Mims
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Breaking...
I don't disagree that there is spin going on. But I really truly can't see
how to refute the testimony from the cop unless he's lying.
Charles Mims
and what happens if he is lying? not that he is but God knows its a possibility in this circus lol
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
