The stun gun would probably be the better choice. You might be able to
discourage the bear before he ripped your arm off or something. I am
not really to sure how a stun gun works, other than I think it involves
electricity. The spear would have to be perfectly placed on the first jab.
If you didn't get him right in the heart, it would really piss him off and
you would be toast. I think.
On Saturday, December 13, 2003, at 07:08 AM, Charles wrote:
While fighting off a crazed polar bear, would you rather be armed with
1) a stun gun
OR
2) a spear?
Charles Mims
http://www.the-sandbox.org
_______________________________________________
Sndbox mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
_______________________________________________ Sndbox mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a8.mewebdns-a8.com/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
