On Thursday, June 24, 2004, 11:01:47 AM, Aaron wrote: AC> Herb,
AC> I have noticed a decline in tagged SPAM. We were tagging aprox 80% of AC> all e-mail as SPAM. The last two days its been about 50%. AC> I haven't looked into it to far, but if this continues I will. Log analysis doesn't show quite that drastic a swing. In fact it seems reasonably nominal. I'll keep watching it over the course of the day as the analysis catches up to more current times. Quite a few hours are in the 79% - 85% range which actually looks like our capture rate is trending upward... but there are not enough data points to make that call. We will know more later. ____ The log analysis is slowed a bit when the rule strengths are recalculated at midnight. It takes a few passes for the log analysis engine to catch up after that heavy job. (The rule strength analysis plows through 1/4 TB of data so it takes a few hours to do the math.) We are a couple weeks away from a new analysis that will allow us to do hourly updates of the rule strength numbers... we are waiting for the data from the new summarizer to fill the current 45 day window. ____ Log data analysis for spam/ham ratio and flow rates available here: http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Performance/FlowRates.jsp _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
