on 12/21/04 8:21 AM, Pete McNeil wrote: > The second possibility is that we've skipped the message for some > safety reason (trying to avoid false positives) though it seems > unlikely in this case. > > Once I see it I will be able to tell more.
Would adding "direct to spam" in the subject make these types of messages any more meaningful/important to you guys? Greg This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
