Does anyone have some simple instructions on how to setup to use a program
alias?
I'm using Bill Landry's script, have not had the time to look in to using a
program alias to download upon receipt of notifications. 


Thanks,

Brian Gregory
President
Network Innovations Inc.
(913) 780-0494 x104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Woody G Fussell
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...

Why do you not use a "program alias" and only download when you receive
notification that a new rule base is available? If everyone used gzip and
only downloaded when notified the bandwidth could be controlled by
staggering the notifications. 

Woody Fussell
Wilbur Smith Associates


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jim Matuska
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...

I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that are
inadvertently downloading the full rulebase all the time.  I didn't even
know it but we were doing this until I went through our update script again
this morning and found it didn't have the -N option in Wget, so we were
downloading the entire rulebase whether we needed it or not.  The gzip
compression is cool, and I will likely implement it soon, but I think the
major problem is everyone that is using scripts that keep downloading the
same file over and over again tying up the bandwidth.

I would recommend 2 things to help alleviate this problem:
1.  Monitor connections to rulebase downloads to see who is downloading the
rulebase everytime they connect on a schedule to determine who has their
scripts setup wrong, and contact them to correct it.  It took me under a
minute to add the -N option to wget, it should be a no brainer.

2.  Correct the scripts posted on the Sniffer website to include date
checking, and possibly gzip compression, I used one of those scripts for our

system and assumed it would be setup correctly, but it was not.

Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech2, CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...


>I agree entirely.  If bandwidth has become an issue, it would be resolved 
>with a focus on producing very tight and easily customizable scripts (a 
>variables section in the top of the scripts).  I believe that going the 
>VBScript route might be the best way to go, or at least I believe that more

>of us can hack a more involved VBScript than a batch or CMD file. 
>Enforcing compressed downloads and checking for timestamps prior to 
>downloading should be done in these scripts as well.
>
> Right now the script examples assume a familiarity with scripting, and 
> while local participants can mostly handle that stuff, the non-vocal ones 
> are most likely to not even be aware of the issues or how to fix them, and

> might have scripted timed downloads because it is definitely the easiest 
> way to go.  This is probably the majority of the customer base.  There is 
> an impression for instance with Declude's user base that +80% use 
> primarily the default config which most of us know is severely lacking in 
> comparison to the potential that exists by tweaking the settings.
>
> With better script examples and a careful step-by-step readme promoted in 
> a mailing to your customers, I believe that this issue could go away, or 
> at least theoretically it should.
>
> Personally, I have mine tied to the E-mails, I download the zipped 
> versions, I don't bother checking on the status, and have never noticed 
> any issues as a result.  It would be a small shame if I was missing 
> downloads due to timeouts, but not that big of a deal if this has never 
> caused a noticeable problem.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
> Andy Schmidt wrote:
>
>>Pete,
>>
>>With all due respect - I think the download problem is "self-inflicted",
>>because your web site is providing unsuitable examples to your customers!
>>Even with moderate bandwidth, your server would be able to handle tens of
>>thousands of hits a day.  Checking if an updated file exists should barely
>>be noticeable - as long as it doesn't result in an unnecessary download.
>>You probably suffer TWO problems:
>>
>>A) Most of your customers are downloading rules based on a schedule, even 
>>if
>>no rules exists. Potential savings: 100% per download attempt.
>>
>>B) Your customers are not downloading "compressed" rule files. Potential 
>>savings: about 66%, but that's not bad either.
>>
>>
>>One likely explanation is that at least THREE of your sample scripts do an
>>unconditional and uncompressed download!  Here the 3 URLs you list on your
>>web site and WGET command they are using:
>>
>>http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/UserScripts/david_snifferUp
da
>>teMethod.zip
>>wget http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/xxxxxxxx.snf -O 
>>xxxxxxxx.new
>>--http-user=username --http-passwd=password
>>
>>
>>http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/UserScripts/Hank_SnifferScr
ip
>>ts.zip
>>wget http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/xxxxxxxx.snf -O 
>>xxxxxxxx.new
>>--http-user=sniffer --http-passwd=ki11sp8m
>>
>>
>>http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/UserScripts/Michiel_AutoUpd
at
>>e.zip
>>wget
>>http://sniffer:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Sniffer/Updates/12345678.snf
-O
>><serial>.tst
>>
>>My recommendation: Replace these with examples that implement conditional,
>>compressed downloading.
>>
>>Best Regards
>>Andy Schmidt
>>
>>H&M Systems Software, Inc.
>>600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
>>Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
>>
>>Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
>>Fax:    +1 201 934-9206
>>
>>http://www.HM-Software.com/
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
>>Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 08:10 AM
>>To: Chuck Schick
>>Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
>>
>>
>>On Monday, December 27, 2004, 1:17:21 AM, Chuck wrote:
>>
>>CS> Pete:
>>
>>CS> It appears on weekends the sniffer downloads are really slow. I am CS>

>>downloading at 14 minutes past the hour and I am about 1/20 th of CS> the 
>>normal speed.
>>
>>That is an unusual observation - I don't think weekends have anything to 
>>do
>>with making things slower. I will look at the logs to see if I can figure
>>out what heppened.
>>
>>You're not manually downloading I hope?
>>
>>_M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information 
>>and
>>(un)subscription instructions go to
>>http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
>>
>>
>>This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information 
>>and (un)subscription instructions go to 
>>http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> =====================================================
> MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
> http://www.mailpure.com/software/
> =====================================================
>
>
> This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information 
> and (un)subscription instructions go to 
> http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
> 


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Reply via email to