|
ok, I think that your are completely right, it seems that
SA is not always detecting it.
In my rules, Bayes = -4,1.
But I have seen lots of email wheren the SNF header was
inserted (X-SortMonster-MessageSniffer-Result: 52), and where the +5 score for
SNF detection has not been taken into account for the final scoring by
SA.
In your situation I should see something
like:
html +1
bayes -4
snf +5
----
total +2
but in the logfiles of the messages, I see sometimes (not
always and that's the problem)
html +1
bayes -4
----
total -3
--> even if the SNF
header is inserted (i.e. X-SortMonster-MessageSniffer-Result: 52)
So we narrowed the
problem to SA (and not SNF)? kind
regards,
Sven
|
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Peer-to-Peer (Support)
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Pete McNeil
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Sven De Troch
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Jorge Asch
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Sven De Troch
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Sven De Troch
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Dave Koontz
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Sven De Troch
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Jorge Asch
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Grant Stufft
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Pete McNeil
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Dave Koontz
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Dave Koontz
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Grant Stufft
- [sniffer] Re: Mdaemon plugin 'sleeping' Sven De Troch
