>>Anyone had any experience using these in place of the OEM
> >>telescoping antenna? Is the range loss significant?
>
> An often asked question. The answer is: Yes.
> So far no one has made an aftermarket antenna that even equals the stock
> one.<<
you've never used the JR base-loaded tx antenna then.. "type accepted" replacement for stock antennas.. skinnier, a bit longer, and a bit more expensive than the "rubber ducks" it works at least as well (concerning range) as the collapsible variety..
although built for JR I know of a couple stylus users that have had great results with this antenna as well. no endorsement of this practice here, just real world use..
Mike Stump
--
CoreComm Webmail.
http://home.core.com
- Re: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck Mike Stump
- Re: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck Bill Swingle
- Re: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck Simon Van Leeuwen
- Re: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck James V. Bacus
- [RCSE] Owning Both Bill Swingle
- Re: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck Mike Stump
- Re: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck James V. Bacus
- RE: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck glide
- Re: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck Bill Swingle
- RE: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck Sheldon-YNT uDesign
- RE: [RCSE] Power/Rubber Duck Sheldon-YNT uDesign