As populations grow and expan into formerly rural areas, land suitable for
use as flying fields is becoming increasingly scarce.  And having to keep
fields at least 3 miles apart to ensure no channel conflicts reduces the
possibilities even further.  The biggest impact of 2.4 is that flying fields
can now be closer together, which means that new fields will be possible
that simply weren¹t viable before.

All the technical arguments notwithstanding, 2.4 will be instrumental in
helping us to solve our number 1 problem: a rapidly dwindling inventory of
places to fly.

--Jim Laurel

Reply via email to