I can second this factor. In every hay field I have considered there are at least two reports of " hey I think there are a bunch of guys who fly on the next farm or two over ... go there!" of course these pilots range from dedicated power flyers to people who have just picked up something off of Ebay and have no idea what they are doing so removing the spectre of conflicts is my number one priority for 09.
David Webb On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Jim Laurel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As populations grow and expan into formerly rural areas, land suitable for > use as flying fields is becoming increasingly scarce. And having to keep > fields at least 3 miles apart to ensure no channel conflicts reduces the > possibilities even further. The biggest impact of 2.4 is that flying fields > can now be closer together, which means that new fields will be possible > that simply weren't viable before. > > All the technical arguments notwithstanding, 2.4 will be instrumental in > helping us to solve our number 1 problem: a rapidly dwindling inventory of > places to fly. > > --Jim Laurel > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
