How is IPD better? Can you have two Tx's on the same freq. and
not have problems?
Karlton Spindle wrote:
>
> PCM was okay and still is if you still have but PAYING $$$ for OLD
> technology SUCKS as well! ;)
> remember we have had PCM receivers in the line for 20 plus years. They did
> not go bad overnight just IPD is better.
>
> Smooth Sailing,
> Karlton Spindle
> http://www.MultiplexRC.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: d. o. darnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 10:30 AM
> Subject: [RCSE] PCM Sucks?
>
> > I'd really interesting to read about the PCM vs. IDS etc. Maybe PCM is
> > slower to generate servo signals but for soaring, that may be a moot
> point.
> > PCM is good system which works well. While there are folks who would
> > besmirch PCM the fact is that there are thousands of Airtronic Visions out
> > there which have worked just fine for over ten years. I have two TXs and
> > seven RXs myself and have never had any trouble with any of them. On the
> > other hand, the "fail safe" theory is just that: A theory. No matter
> where
> > you set the servos in fail safe mode, the ship is still gonna go in.
> (There
> > are those who might argue that fail safe works but I am skeptical) The
> "fail
> > safe" function howler is selectable and need not be used. I have never
> used
> > it and won't for obvious reasons. If my gliders were set up like a "free
> > flight" model, fail safe might be a workable idea, but on the other hand,
> If
> > your glider would fly hands-off, why would a fail safe setting? No
> signal,
> > no servo output. Don't let anyone kid you; PCM is OK.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe"
> and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
