Hay Mike How about this lets get an INDEPENDENT LAB (not a magazine reviewer
a real lab!) to test them I will FRONT ALL THE MONEY TO TEST THE MPX LINE OF
IPD RECEIVERS. ]
Any one who wants to put up another brand FRONT the bucks for testing the
units they want tested. LOOSER pays for ALL the testing Fair?
Restricted to commercially available 72Mhz units bought from dealers. NOT
SUPPLIED from the importer (this way no one can put a ringer in the hopper).
Smooth Sailing,
Karlton Spindle
http://www.MultiplexRC.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Karlton Spindle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: PCM / IPD / PPM
> At 09:30 AM 7/20/00 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >The 7ch IPD out now is single conversion when tested with other single
> >conversion receivers it wins HANDS down. <<
>
> vs JR ABC&W receivers... (549, 636, 649, among others)
>
> I'd really love to see that data...
>
>
> > BUT put a duel conversion PCM and
> >do the same ground range test and the dual conversion wins. HOWEVER just
so
> >happens I have a dual conversion IPD and when tested with the dual
> >conversion PCM it smacks it hard!<<
>
> let's see this data too... graphs or spread-sheets compared to
> top-performing competitors to IPD...
>
> no claims.. just graphs & charts...
>
>
>
> Mike Stump
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
