For the last time Karlton, it is you who has claimed IPD is the be-all
to end-all.
I supplied you with measured test results as you demanded. As you posted
privately, I responded privately. Nor do I need a good reason to claim
superiority, as that is not "my" argument. I believe I have been more
than accommodating.
I respect George. He has contributed a lot to our endeavor. I suggest
everyone get a copy of his journal "A to Z - Radio Control Electronics".
But what will he have to offer that you can't get from your own people
at MPX (other than an unbiased opinion)? How willing is MPX to support
you on your crusade?
Karlton Spindle wrote:
>
> You asked for it you will have it NONE OTHER THEN GEORGE STEINER has tested
> the IPD INDEPENDENTLY. I have been told by Terry at R/C country he will
> email me the test data and I will post it.
>
> Simon you still shooting blanks you have YET to come up with good reason
> that IPD is not better them PCM.
>
> Smooth Sailing,
> Karlton Spindle
> http://www.MultiplexRC.com>
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
