Hi
I write a lot of test for are equipment to prove it is a lot better than
our competitors. This is very easy to do. And it would be very easy
to turn it all around to prove that the competitors is better.
.............So this doesn't really prove anything..........
It will take a lot of flying time to prove it.
Then I don't think you will prove that one system will be the
one that everyone will buy.
Everyone has there brand & mode that that like and fly with.
Only time will tell if IPD has it that much better.
Howard Rudy KA7YWO
SLC, UT.
Karlton Spindle wrote:
> Good Challenge Mike lets do it!
>
> Smooth Sailing,
> Karlton Spindle
> http://www.MultiplexRC.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Karlton Spindle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 3:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [RCSE] PCM / IPD / PPM
>
> > At 11:12 AM 7/20/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> > >Simon you still shooting blanks you have YET to come up with good reason
> > >that IPD is not better them PCM.
> > >
> > >Smooth Sailing,
> > >Karlton Spindle
> > >http://www.MultiplexRC.com>
> >
> >
> > and you've not done a great job of showing, in concrete fashion that IPD
> is
> > UNIVERSALLY better than PCM.. Across the board first.. then by individual
> > brand & model..
> >
> > My guess is there are some (maybe more than a few) different PCM receivers
> > that IPD can't or won't prove to be better than..
> >
> > Mike Stump
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
