Hi YK,
I think you would agree, stranger things have happened within the realms
of RF. Given the o/p of both systems (cell higher wattage), and the poor
shielding within TX's, especially the digital programming section, I
would not rule out the potential to change some 1's and 0's. The term
"never", or "100% of the time", as it relates to RF is a misnomer.
YK Chan wrote:
>
> Claudio,
> Why would you doubt that? The RF signal that the associated TX
> radiation is the dominant interference comparing to other Radio
> equipment. In other words, if it survived it own Tx it should be
> strong enough to immune to a Cell phone radiation through the air.
> YK Chan
> Seattle
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
>"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Simon Van Leeuwen, Calgary, Alberta
RADIUS SYSTEMS
Cogito-Ergo-Zoom
IAC25233*MAAC12835*IMAC1756*LSF5953*IMAA20209
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
