We are not saying that we expect it to be easy. By all means make it harder.
I am sure that the Level 5's would like another challenge (just ask Mal
Pring who is doing it all again)!
It can be made harder without the need for contests.
Perhapes we need to leave the existing levels alone and add parallel
"non-contest" levels with more challenging tasks.
Paul Ferguson
Adelaide, Australia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 10:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [RCSE] Contests and LSF Levels
>
>
> Gents,
>
> To all those that either don't see the point of having
> competition goals
> as part of LSF, or don't think they should have to compete and SUCCEED
> in competition as part of the LSF program, I have something to say.
>
> Don't get involved in LSF in the first place if you aren't willing to
> play by the same
> set of rules as the thousands of others that are willing to challenge
> themselves by those rules.
>
> Don't expect it to be easy, because it isn't, never was, and
> never will
> be. If you want to aspire to be as good as you can be, then
> learn from
> the experience. If you are afraid to fail, this program
> probably isn't
> for you, you have nothing to learn because you are already
> the best you
> ever will be.
>
> Don't expect the majority of fliers testing themselves against the LSF
> levels to sympathize with your need to succeed the easy way. Just go
> find a sheet of LSF decals and put the level number you think you rate
> on your plane (then go to one of the mail order universities and get
> yourself the degree you think you deserve, but won't work for).
>
> Jim Thomas
> LSF 4629, Level V #68
> PhD Oregon State University 1979
>
>
>
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send
> "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
