RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
In the current issue of "Model Aviation" which I received today I found
the "Presidents Perspective" page quite interesting. It makes it quite
evident that there is a complete lack knowledge as to what we in the soaring
community are all about.
In his remarks he (Dave Brown) states that his recommendation to the FAA
is that a minimum altitude restriction be set at 700' and preferably 1,000'.
Probably just fine for the "slime" machines but a death blow to sailplanes.
These restrictions while unenforceable, would in essence make the even
average weekend flier a lawbreaker,not to mention the whole liability
problem.
Anybody out there have any idea as to who to contact to get this thing
turned around,somebody who will make the AMA listen !
Allan Parsons
- [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to soaring Allan/Tara
- RE: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to soaring John Derstine
- Re: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to soari... Jeff Steifel
- Re: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to s... Martin Usher
- Re: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to soaring Bill Swingle
- Re: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to soaring martinusher
- Re: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to soari... Keith
- Re: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to s... Tom Nagel
- Re: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard ... Albert E. Wedworth
- Re: [RCSE] AMA's position with regard to soaring Bill Swingle